Danielson+Rubric+Sample+Evidence+for+Librarian+Evaluation


 * Danielson Rubric Sample Evidence for Evaluating Librarians **

The Charlotte Danielson rubric is a framework for professional practice, from meeting novices’ needs to enhancing veterans’ skills. It is a helpful “road map”. It is useful to practicing educators and to the larger community because it conveys the fact that educators, like other professionals, are members of a professional community.

Last year the teachers’ rubric was piloted in over 43 CPS schools in areas 2, 8, 13, and 16; and is currently being piloted to include all of the schools in those areas and 15 AMPS schools for a total of over 100 schools. The Danielson rubric is a supplemental tool principals will use as part of the local criteria to evaluate teachers. Human Resources wants all CPS schools involved by 2011-12.

The CPS Department of Libraries and Information Services is in the process crafting the rubric in order to the address the unique responsibilities of CPS elementary and high school librarians. Librarians will have an exceptional opportunity to become involved in the process. During the fall 2009 Library Learning Community meetings, many of you participated by contributing sample evidence for Domains 2 and 4.

Please provide sample evidence for each of the domain areas as they relate to your job; one in the Proficient and one in the Distinguished categories for Domains 1 – 4. //Please make your answers concise.// You can type directly into the form. **If you contributed to Domains 2 and 4 at the LLC meeting this fall, you need not do so again, you can focus on 1 and 3.** If you need additional information, the **Excellence in Teaching Project** website ( @http://www.chicagoteacherexcellence.org/ ) contains a helpful teacher’s guide and examples of Domains 1 – 4 for teachers. [] // If you would like a copy of your form, you will need to print it before you click the Submit button. //
 * Please complete the form and submit it by** **Friday, December 11, 2009****, to have your sample evidence considered.**

We appreciate your input.